How Verdictum Covers Latest Legal News in India: A Complete Overview

Image
Introduction In today’s fast-moving legal environment, access to timely and accurate legal information is no longer a luxury—it is a necessity. Whether you are a lawyer, law student, corporate professional, or someone simply interested in legal developments, staying updated with the latest judgments, policies, and regulatory changes is crucial. India, with its vast and evolving legal system, has seen a growing demand for reliable legal news platforms. Among the emerging platforms, Verdictum has carved out a strong position by offering consistent, well-structured, and insightful legal coverage. This article explores what makes Verdictum stand out and why it is increasingly recognized as one of the  top legal news platforms in India . The Growing Importance of Legal News Platforms in India India’s legal landscape is dynamic and complex. With frequent updates from courts, tribunals, and regulatory bodies, professionals need a dependable source that delivers accurate information quickl...
Post a Comment

A Critical Review of Women’s Property Rights in India

Women’s Right to Property Under Hindu Law

  •  Hindu women's inheritance rights have been limited since the start. Women were not viewed as equals to men in the past, and they did not have the same rights as males in society.
  •  Women were denied property rights because they were deemed incapable of participating in sacrificial rites and were not allowed to provide funeral cakes for the spiritual redemption of the common ancestor. This prohibition dates back to religious customs.

Woman’s Property Right under Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools

  • While the Dayabhaga School was practiced across Eastern India, particularly in Bengal and Assam, the Mitakshara School was practiced throughout India, with the exception of the Eastern region.
  • Women's property rights were severely limited at Mitakshara School, where it was thought that they would never be able to become coparceners.
  • The widow of a deceased coparcener was not permitted to enforce a division of her husband's portion against his siblings, nor was she able to obtain his half.
  • In contrast to Mitakshara school, Dayabhaga school was more permissive and had different views on women's inheritance and heirs.
  •  o Compared to Mitakshara School, widows at Dayabhaga School enjoyed stronger property rights. They could execute a division against their deceased husband's brothers and were entitled to inherit his portion.
  • The Dayabhaga school of thought placed restrictions even if it allowed for some degree of independence. In situations where a widowed woman without sons dies, for instance, her husband's portion is inherited by the closest male heir rather than her daughters.

 Hindu Woman’s Right After the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

  • In the modern era of changing standards, it is recognized that women should be given the same position and rights as males in order to promote the development of the country.
  • As a result, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (HSA), the first significant piece of legislation acknowledging women's property inheritance rights, was created. Since then, women's property inheritance rights have developed.
  • Section 14: A female Hindu's property is her absolute property: (1) Any property owned by a female Hindu, whether acquired before to or following the implementation of this Act, is hers as complete ownership, not as limited ownership.
  • Section 14: A female Hindu's property is her absolute property: (1) Any property owned by a female Hindu, whether acquired before to or following the implementation of this Act, is hers as complete ownership, not as limited ownership.
  • Women are granted unlimited rights over any property they own, as per the terms of Section 14 of the HSA.
  • Women are granted unrestricted rights under the Act, including the ability to sell their property. Both immovable and moveable property are possible.
  • Any Hindu woman can use her property without the authorization or approval of her father, spouse, or other family members thanks to Section 14 of the HSA. She can transfer her property whenever she wants and use the money that is received whatever she pleases.

Hindu Woman’s Right after Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005

·         Sons had rights over the deceased father's property prior to the Hindu Succession Amendment Act of 2005, whereas daughters could only do so while they were still single.

·         The 174th Law Commission Report's recommendations led to the passage of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which significantly altered the 1956 Act.

·         Previously reserved for the male family members, married women could now inherit their father's property.

·         To put it another way, women might now enjoy equal depositionary rights to the patriarch's property and become coparceners in a succession.

·         Women can now inherit property as coparceners according to an amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act that addresses the devolution of coparcenary property.

Section 6 of HSA

·         The long-standing discriminatory practice of barring women from the coparcenary system was abolished by the 2005 Amendment, as stated in Section 6 of the HSA. It was accomplished by changing HSA Section 6.

·         According to Section 6(1) of the modified HSA, a coparcener's daughter will naturally become a coparcener in her own right, just like her sons.

·         In this manner, Section 6(1) grants the coparcener's sons and daughters equal rights and obligations.

·         A portion of the coparcenary property.

·         A deceased coparcener's interest in a Hindu Undivided Family's assets will pass through testamentary or intestate succession, per Section 6(3) of the HSA. Devolution must take place so that:

·         The daughter's share is equal to the son's. The share of the predeceased woman coparcener

Hindu Adoption and Maintenace Act, 1956

·         In addition, Section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA) allows a daughter-in-law to demand maintenance from her father-in-law if she is unable to support herself out of her own income or assets. If she has no assets, she cannot receive maintenance from her spouse, parents, or kids.

·         If the father-in-law does not possess any coparcenary property from which the daughter-in-law has not received a share, then any obligation under sub-section (1) of Section 19 as previously mentioned will not be enforceable. Additionally, any such obligation will end upon the daughter-in-law's remarriage.

The advancement of a nation in the modern day depends on making sure that its women are not left behind. Theoretically and practically, women should have the same rights and opportunities as men. A country can only start along the path of growth when it really maintains gender equality in both concept and practice. Since the daughters now have the same birthright to the ancestral property as the sons, their interest in it is protected now that they have been acknowledged as coparceners. The father cannot deny the daughters their portion of the property by testamentary disposition.

📜 Looking you best Place for the Latest Supreme & High Court Judgments in India Whether you're a law student, legal professional, or just someone who wants to stay informed, having the right sources⚖️ 

Verdictum is a leading Indian legal news portal dedicated to providing accurate and timely updates on legal developments across the country. It offers comprehensive coverage of judgments from the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, and other significant legal news, making it a valuable resource for legal professionals, students, and anyone interested in the Indian legal system.​

 

Location: Delhi, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Complete Guide to the Bombay High Court: History, Important Judgements and Insights

Image
Introduction of Bombay High Court The Bombay High Court is one of the oldest High Courts in India, established on August 14, 1862. It is the highest judicial authority in the state of Maharashtra and Goa, and it has jurisdiction over the Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. 1. Key Facts About Bombay High Court: • Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra • Bench Jurisdiction: Also has benches in Nagpur, Aurangabad, and Panaji (Goa) • Chief Justice: Appointed by the President of India • Language of Proceedings: English • Authority: Exercises jurisdiction over civil, criminal, and constitutional matters in Maharashtra and Goa. 2. Functions & Powers: 1. Appellate Authority: Hears appeals from lower courts and tribunals. 2. Writ Jurisdiction: Can issue writs (such as habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, and quo warranto) under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. 3. Judicial Review: Ensures that laws and executive actions comply with the Constitution. 4. S...
Read more

Meghalaya High Court History, Landmark Judgements, and Everything You Should Know

Image
The highest court in the Indian state of Meghalaya is the Meghalaya High Court. Following its separation from the   Gauhati High Court’s   jurisdiction, it was formally constituted on March 23, 2013, under the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) and Other Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 2012.The Meghalayan capital, Shillong, is home to the High Court. In terms of civil, criminal, constitutional, and other legal issues, it has jurisdiction over the whole state of Meghalaya. The President of India appoints the Chief Justice and additional justices to the court, much like in other Indian High Courts. English is used primarily, as in the majority of Indian High Courts. It makes sure that the Constitution’s fundamental rights are upheld and hears appeals, writ petitions, and other cases from Meghalaya’s lower courts and tribunals. 1.  Meghalaya High Court history A. Before Meghalaya Had Its Own High Court Prior to 2013, Meghalaya lacked a High Court of its own. o Through a perm...
Read more

Andhra Pradesh High Court: Everything You Need to Know About Its Legacy

Image
The Andhra Pradesh High Court was established in 1954 Guntur in Andhra Pradesh. The Court, which has its headquarters in Nelapadu, Amaravati, and was established on January 1, 2019, in accordance with a presidential order dated December 26, 2018, after Andhra Pradesh and Telangana were split apart, is the highest court in the state. The Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court at the moment is Shri Dhiraj Singh Thakur. According to Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution , it has sole appellate and writ jurisdiction over the state of Andhra Pradesh. Site assessments are being conducted in order to facilitate judicial access in the Rayalaseema region, and a permanent High Court bench is being proposed at Kurnool. To preserve the purity of the environment, the court strongly ordered TTD and others to halt unapproved construction around Tirumala Hills in March 2025. 1. Andhra Pradesh High Court History The political and administrative shifts in the state have had a major impact on ...
Read more